Interesting column in the Grauniad today by that Sutherland* chappie about how good an idea it would be to make 'higher (ie tertiary) education' more accessible, subsidised and generally 'friendly' for 'older' students - ie. people in their fifties plus, instead of a near-exclusive enclave of the relatively very young. He highlighted the advantages of the superior financial nous, better time-management and general extensive life experience of the older student.
I'm a thirty-seven-year-old part-time PhD student, working both in a hospital-attached medical school and a marine biology lab, and I think he's got a great point. Certainly, I'm a more effective researcher/ studier/ resource investigator than I was for my undergrad work, and I think it would be great to see more 'older' students around campus. We seem to suffer with a terrible age-stratification in Britain. Besides the universities, the pubs and clubs are either under-21 or 'old fogey'. It's such a waste.
I believe the situation is not as acute in the US. Comments and experiences, anyone?
*Not Donald. He was the one that drove that Sherman tank around France after gold with Clint Eastwood. The other one.
I'm a thirty-seven-year-old part-time PhD student, working both in a hospital-attached medical school and a marine biology lab, and I think he's got a great point. Certainly, I'm a more effective researcher/ studier/ resource investigator than I was for my undergrad work, and I think it would be great to see more 'older' students around campus. We seem to suffer with a terrible age-stratification in Britain. Besides the universities, the pubs and clubs are either under-21 or 'old fogey'. It's such a waste.
I believe the situation is not as acute in the US. Comments and experiences, anyone?
*Not Donald. He was the one that drove that Sherman tank around France after gold with Clint Eastwood. The other one.
Comment